Mogul (was Re: RELEASE on March, 1st !!!)

[Denys Duchier]

Kevin Glynn <glynn at info.ucl.ac.be> writes:

> I don't know, but this seems less work for you and less confusing for
> the users than mixing versions of packages.

_I_ don't do _any_ maintenance of the MOGUL site - there is no human
intervention - this is entirely automated - that was the whole point.
I can modify the code of the MOGUL librarian (and of ozmake) to expose
additional information.  The MOGUL librarian itself doesn't even look
at packages - that's not its job.  It looks only at these funny little
text files that describe contributors' sections.  These text files are
maintained by contributors (well, by ozmake --publish if you use
that).  What I suggested was that NEW ozmake could add another piece
of info in the text file that describes a package: namely, whether it
is new-style (or some related info), and that the MOGUL librarian
should then expose that information.

Cheers,

-- 
Dr. Denys Duchier
Équipe Calligramme
LORIA, Nancy, FRANCE