Copyright -> License

[Kevin Glynn]

Per Starback writes:
 > > Thanks,  that explains PR#1649
 > > 
 > >    http://www.mozart-oz.org/cgi-bin/oz-bugs/incoming?id=1649
 > 
 > Ah, I didn't look that far. I guess I should have made a comment to
 > that instead.
 > 
 > > I'm not an rpm user. Do you know if this change is likely to cause
 > > problems for other rpm based systems such as suse, mandrake etc.?  Do
 > > you have a link to a spec of the rpm spec file so that I can verify
 > > this? (I looked and failed :-().
 > 
 > I don't think it's likely to cause problems. It seems like Red Hat
 > deprecated this a long time ago, but that they went directly from
 > "depcreated but without warning" to "won't work", which doesn't seem
 > that wise.
 > 
 > I don't know where the spec of the spec file is.
 > I found the thread at
 > <http://www.redhat.com/archives/rpm-list/2005-February/msg00049.html>
 > when googling for this problem.
 > 

Yes, that is all I found too.


 > (It's not possible to build the rpms straight away on Fedora Core 4
 > then anyway I found out later. Maybe because it's GCC 4, or should
 > that work?)
 > 

gcc 4.x should work if you take the latest trunk or the latest on the
release branch (mozart-1-3-0-fixes).  

If they don't work please post more details.

k