Infrastructure for Mozart development
Olivier Lefevre
lefevrol at yahoo.com
Sun Jun 4 02:56:33 CEST 2006
>> Do you imply that projects hosted at SF are often less maintained /
>> less developing than Mozart does right now? Many of these projects
>> appear to be very healthy.
Yes but there are scores who aren't. And SF is not particularly
reliable: there have been major problems with their CVS for a good
part of the year. If you must go for a public service like SF, at
least do a little research and consider the alternatives: it is not
the only game in town. A number of suggestions were proffered on
this thread: http://ranger.befunk.com/blog/archives/000680.html
> The advantage of moving to SF or Savanah is that we don't have the
> "developers' account administration problem" any more.
OK. You must have very rigid procedures for this to be a major
argument, though.
Regards,
-- O.L.
More information about the mozart-hackers
mailing list