Fwd: Mozart/Oz Portfiles

Raphael Collet raph at info.ucl.ac.be
Tue Aug 8 15:54:03 CEST 2006


I just forwarded this message to Marc Hougardy.

Cheers,
raph

Brent Fulgham wrote:
> 
> Attached is some e-mail between me and one of the Darwinports guys.  I 
> had submitted ports to them a long while back, based on the CVS for 
> Mozart, but now that the 1.3.2 sources build properly and Marc Hougardy 
> has created a set of files to install I asked them to update to reflect 
> his work.
> 
> The updates are now pending in the Darwinports tracking system, but I 
> don't have Marc Hougardy's e-mail information and hope that he is not 
> offended by the idea of merging his stuff into the main Darwinports 
> archive so that it will be available natively.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Brent
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> *From: *Mark Duling <mark.duling at biola.edu <mailto:mark.duling at biola.edu>>
>> *Date: *August 6, 2006 10:22:45 PM PDT
>> *To: *Brent Fulgham <bfulgham at mac.com <mailto:bfulgham at mac.com>>
>> *Subject: **Re: Mozart/Oz Portfiles*
>>
>> Brent Fulgham <bfulgham at mac.com <mailto:bfulgham at mac.com>> writes:
>>> I while back I started to put together a Portfile for the Mozart/Oz  
>>> language (and ancillary libraries), but discovered that a core Mozart/ 
>>> Oz member had already done so.  Could they be integrated into the  
>>> main Portfile archive so they would be available natively as part of  
>>> Darwinports?
>>
>> Brent,
>>
>> Looks like erickt at dslextreme.com <mailto:erickt at dslextreme.com> 
>> submitted these:
>>
>> mozart/oz base portfile:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6826
>>
>> mozart/oz stdlib portfile:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6827
>>
>> But I see that recently a new version 1.3.2 is out.  That is better since
>> tarballs are always preferred and I assume a CVS copy is no longer
>> necessary for OS X.  Would you be willing to update these portfiles for
>> v1.3.2 tarballs and append the portfiles to the respective bug reports? 
>> If so it would be the easiest thing.  Or I suppose you or I could note in
>> the bugs that newer versions are out and cc Erick if he'd like to update
>> them since it seems he'd like to be maintainer for them.  But if it
>> requires no major changes I don't think it is a big deal for just a
>> version update and I often do that before comitting if a newer version
>> comes out before we get to it so we don't start off behind the times.  Let
>> me know what you think.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
> 




More information about the mozart-hackers mailing list