[Fwd: The LP Module (Again)]

Gustavo Gutierrez ggutierrez at atlas.puj.edu.co
Mon Feb 26 15:09:18 CET 2007


On 2/26/07, Boriss Mejias <boris.mejias at uclouvain.be> wrote:
> Dear Hackers,
>
> Here is a proposal of Paul Snively for fixing some bugs in the LP
> module. In order to take a decision about this, I would like to
> understand some things.
>
> Are these fixes meant for the LP code included in mozart/contrib/lp ? In
> that case, I'm confused because the patch doesn't match the source code.
>
No there aren't.

> Is there any other LP module?
>
> Is there anybody with enough knowledge about the LP module to give an
> opinion about the patch?


Some time ago i reimplemented  the real interval module because the
one made by Tobias Mueller had some problems and did not provide
enough operations to suit our needs. I build the new module from
scratch and uploaded it to gna.org.  This new module never has been
part of the  official mozart repository. However i thin it offers
several advantage over the official one.

As the LP module provided in the mozart sources relies in the real
interval module i also implemented a new module for that. Both modules
can be found at the https://gna.org site.

I think there is an important question: Should we include the new ri
and lp modules in the mozart distribution?.  Or maybe we can put them
in the mogul repository.

Cheers,
-- 
Gustavo Gutierrez


More information about the mozart-hackers mailing list