Interoperability under Windows (Was: [Oz] Oz vs. Squeak)

[Mikael Kindborg]

My primary need would be to call external services from Oz,
rather than making Oz avaiable as a service (even though
many people seems to want to use Oz in this way). The reason
for this is that a view Oz as the primary development language.
/Micke

At 15:09 2001-02-03 +0100, Denys Duchier wrote:

>I was referring to the idea of making Oz functionality available e.g.
>through COM technology.  Repackaging this functionality so that it may
>be embedded in other applications is not a platform specific effort.
>
>Personally, I would rather first aim to make it easy for arbitrary
>applications to communicate with an Oz process, e.g. using DCOM,
>CORBA, SOAP, XML-RPC, a direct interface to the Oz marshaling
>protocol, or whatever takes your fancy.  I believe this would be more
>robust, practical, scalable, and has the advantage that we can have it
>today.


-
Please send submissions to users at mozart-oz.org
and administriva mail to users-request at mozart-oz.org.
The Mozart Oz web site is at http://www.mozart-oz.org/.